Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5911 - 5920 of 8262 for gf-175.

[PDF] Brown County v. Marcella G.
L., 643 P.2d 168, 175-76 (Kan. 1982) (adopting the “existing Indian family” exception). Other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3818 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] NOTICE
N.W.2d 175. Because the record does not support an inference that the information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33294 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. See Vargo v. Beaudry, 46 Wis. 2d 230, 241, 175 N.W.2d 473 (1970). No. 2018AP1301-FT 14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241630 - 2019-06-04

State v. Zebelum Smith
of discretion. State v. Jenkins, 168 Wis. 2d 175, 186, 483 N.W.2d 262 (Ct. App. 1992). However, in the present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4095 - 2005-03-31

Jane Nielsen v. Terese A. Spencer
In a similar vein, in Wells v. Hickman, 657 N.E.2d 172, 175, 178 (Ind. Ct. App. 1995), a fifteen-year-old boy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19236 - 2005-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
, 309 Wis. 2d 365, ¶29; see also Loy v. Bunderson, 107 Wis. 2d 400, 410, 320 N.W.2d 175 (1982
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113177 - 2014-05-28

COURT OF APPEALS
. Bunderson, 107 Wis. 2d 400, 416-17, 320 N.W.2d 175 (1982). A Loy release, or covenant not to sue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69330 - 2011-08-08

State v. Maria S.
,’ we will affirm that verdict.” Id., ¶39 (quoting Lundin v. Shimanski, 124 Wis. 2d 175, 184, 368 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6812 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 128
, 356 N.W.2d 175, 176–180 (1984). 9 274, 282, 548 N.W.2d 57, 60 (1996) (“[I]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125543 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Carter T. Hopson
suited to consider relevant factors concerning the defendant and demeanor. State v. Echols, 175 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6958 - 2017-09-20