Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5911 - 5920 of 39047 for probate forms.
Search results 5911 - 5920 of 39047 for probate forms.
COURT OF APPEALS
no contest plea, the State agreed to recommend probation with no more than six months in jail as a condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30467 - 2007-10-01
no contest plea, the State agreed to recommend probation with no more than six months in jail as a condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30467 - 2007-10-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a Division of Hearings and Appeals No. 2019AP489 2 (DHA) decision to revoke Risch’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333095 - 2021-02-09
a Division of Hearings and Appeals No. 2019AP489 2 (DHA) decision to revoke Risch’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333095 - 2021-02-09
Frontsheet
intimidation counts, the PSI recommended that the court withhold sentence and impose probation terms of three
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116902 - 2014-07-10
intimidation counts, the PSI recommended that the court withhold sentence and impose probation terms of three
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116902 - 2014-07-10
State v. Thomas William Koeppen
stayed these sentences and ordered Koeppen to serve three years probation. However, Judge Dreyfus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10772 - 2005-03-31
stayed these sentences and ordered Koeppen to serve three years probation. However, Judge Dreyfus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10772 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case is contrary to a previous probate judgment concerning the same property, and that its factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35458 - 2009-02-04
in this case is contrary to a previous probate judgment concerning the same property, and that its factual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35458 - 2009-02-04
[PDF]
State v. Thomas William Koeppen
to serve three years probation. However, Judge Dreyfus further ordered that the probation term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10772 - 2017-09-20
to serve three years probation. However, Judge Dreyfus further ordered that the probation term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10772 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Frontsheet
, and to complete 15 years of probation. He was also fined $5,000, ordered to pay costs, and ordered
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293169 - 2020-09-30
, and to complete 15 years of probation. He was also fined $5,000, ordered to pay costs, and ordered
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=293169 - 2020-09-30
[PDF]
State v. Christopher A. Wolter
while intoxicated, and from an order denying reconsideration of the probation sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15984 - 2017-09-21
while intoxicated, and from an order denying reconsideration of the probation sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15984 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for challenging the sentences imposed after revocation of Sexton’s probation. Sexton was informed of her right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262712 - 2020-06-02
for challenging the sentences imposed after revocation of Sexton’s probation. Sexton was informed of her right
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=262712 - 2020-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
there is no basis for challenging the sentence imposed after revocation of Pingel’s probation. Pingel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141759 - 2017-09-21
there is no basis for challenging the sentence imposed after revocation of Pingel’s probation. Pingel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141759 - 2017-09-21