Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59121 - 59130 of 63601 for records.

[PDF] State v. Bobbie K.
not dispute this assessment. ¶5 The record is replete with evidence that Bobbie K. resisted efforts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18646 - 2017-09-21

State v. Keith M. Carey
and the person’s attorney of record in the prior criminal proceeding at least 14 days prior to transferring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6587 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Dane County Department of Human Services v. P. P.
that testimony not credible. Thus, the substantial evidence in the record of unfitness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6872 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Frontsheet
of the firm with records showing the work he had done through the Wisconsin LLC while employed by the firm
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=648333 - 2023-04-25

[PDF] Stephen G. Walker v. Monte B. Tobin
not appear from the record that the parties presented evidence or specifically addressed whether Walker’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10579 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is of no consequence given the court’s other findings and the record as a whole. No. 2014AP2947 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149033 - 2017-09-21

State v. Clinton L. Duhm
are to the 2001-02 version. [2] Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). [3] Duhm’s brief contradicts the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6098 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
explain its exercise of discretion, we will review the record to determine whether it provides adequate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100138 - 2013-07-25

[PDF] Glinder Drake v. Marcia E. Huber
. As part of her investigation, Huber examined the Reception Center’s records, and interviewed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11569 - 2017-09-19

Radunka Runjo v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company
. In response, Chrzan argues that there is no basis in the record for the proposition that the jury was misled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8200 - 2005-03-31