Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59131 - 59140 of 74898 for public records.

[PDF] State v. Antonio V. Henderson
is the trial court’s finding that the conditional release was never effectuated. ¶8 The record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14979 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was significantly compromised by the remote appearance. However, the record and Schultz’s own admissions in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=850856 - 2024-09-18

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
will not reverse a discretionary determination if the record shows that discretion was in fact exercised and we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242202 - 2019-06-19

[PDF] State v. Dale A. Coppock
credible, the Larson version was inherently unreasonable is unsupported by the record and is clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4980 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on factual claims that were refuted by the record. We confined our review to three issues: (1) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162835 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
). 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170712 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Victoria H.
the credibility of witnesses and the weight given to their testimony. Id. To that end, we search the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7676 - 2017-09-19

State v. Kenneth Moffett
unassailable. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 690 (1985). Consequently, the record fails
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5200 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=730769 - 2023-11-22

COURT OF APPEALS
of record, the correct legal standard, and we can perceive a reasonable basis for the court’s decision. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52528 - 2010-07-27