Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59181 - 59190 of 62151 for does.

[PDF] Supreme Court Rule petition 12-01 - Rule proposal by Justice Roggensack
and procedure that does not affect a substantive right of parties. (b) Rule relating to the administration
/supreme/docs/1201commentsroggensack2.pdf - 2013-08-05

[PDF] Supporting memo for Supreme Court rule petition 19-05
appeal the matter to the Court. The Supreme Court does not review the report or the order imposing
/supreme/docs/1905memo.pdf - 2019-03-19

[PDF] Supporting memo for Supreme Court rule petition 19-01
SCR 71.01 references alternative methods of making the record but does not list the accepted forms
/supreme/docs/1901memo.pdf - 2019-01-25

[PDF] 2023AP001399 - Memo in Support of Wisconsin Legislature's Motion to Intervene
, “the partisan makeup of districts does not implicate any justiciable or cognizable right.” Johnson I, 2021 WI
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/23ap1399_0822memo.pdf - 2023-10-16

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - December
than the defendant (the tortfeasor). While the law does not require a reduction in any malpractice
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - April 2011
whether to grant applications for new wells. The Village argues that the Public Trust Doctrine does
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62776 - 2014-09-15

[PDF]
Valdovinos’s postconviction motion, the State does not argue that Valdovinos forfeited this argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=944807 - 2025-04-24

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
not address both prongs of the Strickland test if the defendant does not make a sufficient showing on one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=662648 - 2023-05-31

[PDF] State v. Carroll D. Watkins
exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence does not mean that if any of the evidence brought forth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2122 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Nora M. Al-Shammari
the warrant if there is reason to believe he will be found there; the officer does not need a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14887 - 2017-09-21