Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59191 - 59200 of 63539 for records.

[PDF] Dunn County Department of Human Services v. Jeffrey S.
to adopt her would sever her bond with her half-brother. No. 01-0503 10 ¶29 The record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3643 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Eleanor Last v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
In an appeal from the entry of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14834 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Ricky McMorris
be suppressed because the record is murky as to whether the robber had facial hair. However, this uncertainty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9434 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Ryan A. Jacques
and one-half years old when he was first sentenced. 6 Moreover, he now has a felony record. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4591 - 2017-09-19

Wexford Village Homes Association, Inc. v. William Woehrle, Jr.
the record to determine if the circuit court logically interpreted the facts, applied the proper legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14352 - 2005-03-31

State v. Russell L. Rose
Rose’s motion and applied it. Moreover, based upon the record and the trial court’s findings, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4974 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Rick Montgomery v. Carl J. Mahler
and that they therefore owned at least part of the tree. The record supported the trial court's finding. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8957 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
in selecting an impartial jury. A review of the record shows that the court sufficiently examined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30691 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the [circuit] courts must blindly apply”). A court is not required to explain its reasoning on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=612857 - 2023-01-20

[PDF] State v. Lee Raven
the reasonableness of the order was obvious. Therefore, we conclude that under the undisputed facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15650 - 2017-09-21