Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5921 - 5930 of 14662 for ag.
Search results 5921 - 5930 of 14662 for ag.
Erna Seidlitz v. Dieter Seidlitz
that Dieter, then age sixty-one, was approaching retirement and that the income available to Dieter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12250 - 2005-03-31
that Dieter, then age sixty-one, was approaching retirement and that the income available to Dieter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12250 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brown County v. Marsha A.G.
No. 96-3154 IN THE INTEREST OF DAMARIS G., a person under the age of 18: BROWN COUNTY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11648 - 2017-09-19
No. 96-3154 IN THE INTEREST OF DAMARIS G., a person under the age of 18: BROWN COUNTY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11648 - 2017-09-19
Ilona Preiss v. Alfred Preiss
8, 1999. At the time of divorce, Alfred, age fifty-seven, was retired from the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16312 - 2005-03-31
8, 1999. At the time of divorce, Alfred, age fifty-seven, was retired from the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16312 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Brown County v. Marsha A.G.
No. 96-3154 IN THE INTEREST OF DAMARIS G., a person under the age of 18: BROWN COUNTY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11647 - 2017-09-19
No. 96-3154 IN THE INTEREST OF DAMARIS G., a person under the age of 18: BROWN COUNTY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11647 - 2017-09-19
Daniel A. Dietrich v. Jeanne A. Dietrich
for twelve years—or until Jeanne was of retirement age. Daniel argues that the trial court never explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5679 - 2005-03-31
for twelve years—or until Jeanne was of retirement age. Daniel argues that the trial court never explained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5679 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
THE AGE OF 17: DAVID PATTON, APPELLANT, V. CIRCUIT COURT FOR KENOSHA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701407 - 2023-09-13
THE AGE OF 17: DAVID PATTON, APPELLANT, V. CIRCUIT COURT FOR KENOSHA
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701407 - 2023-09-13
[PDF]
State v. Robert Fowler
. 2d 823, 612 N.W.2d 94. We disagree with both contentions. ¶5 WISCONSIN STAT. § 980.02(2)(ag
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2337 - 2017-09-19
. 2d 823, 612 N.W.2d 94. We disagree with both contentions. ¶5 WISCONSIN STAT. § 980.02(2)(ag
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2337 - 2017-09-19
State v. Samuel V. Perez
age sixteen, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) (2001-02).[1] Perez moved to suppress inculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6074 - 2005-03-31
age sixteen, contrary to Wis. Stat. § 948.02(2) (2001-02).[1] Perez moved to suppress inculpatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6074 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert Fowler
disagree with both contentions. ¶5 Wisconsin Stat. § 980.02(2)(ag) (1997‑98)[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2337 - 2005-03-31
disagree with both contentions. ¶5 Wisconsin Stat. § 980.02(2)(ag) (1997‑98)[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2337 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
., a person under the age of 18: Patrick J. T., Petitioner-Respondent, v. Shelly S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98077 - 2013-06-12
., a person under the age of 18: Patrick J. T., Petitioner-Respondent, v. Shelly S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98077 - 2013-06-12