Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5921 - 5930 of 29942 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
requirement of reasonableness presents a question of law, subject to our de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137235 - 2017-09-21

2008 WI APP 56
that Benzinger actually worked with Building Services’s asbestos. As explained below, our review is de novo. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31846 - 2008-04-29

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
provisions applicable to restitution awards, we review the court’s interpretation de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054224 - 2025-12-23

[PDF] Marion Wilson v. Clarence L. Ogilvie
standard of review. Ogilvie contends that we must review de novo whether the facts fulfill the legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14647 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
minutes of testimony on the second day of trial in her absence. We review that question de novo, see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86702 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
this prima facie showing is a question of law that we review de novo. See Oneida Cty. DSS v. Therese S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210906 - 2018-04-10

State v. Raymond F. Molitor
. The constitutionality of a statute is a question of law which we decide de novo. State v. Borrell, 167 Wis.2d 749, 762
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11436 - 2005-03-31

Dennis Demarce v. Francis E. Diesing
interpretation is de novo. Wick v. Waterman, 143 Wis.2d 676, 678, 421 N.W.2d 872, 872-73 (Ct. App. 1988
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14591 - 2005-03-31

Alan Schroeder v. Equitable Bank
); see also § 802.08(2), Stats. “Although summary judgment presents a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13118 - 2005-03-31

Patricia A. Vrieze v. John H. Vrieze
of a trial court's grant of summary judgment is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13115 - 2005-03-31