Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5921 - 5930 of 68517 for did.
Search results 5921 - 5930 of 68517 for did.
State v. Alvin Braden
argument. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in allowing the other acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4731 - 2005-03-31
argument. Because the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in allowing the other acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4731 - 2005-03-31
State v. Diane R.
has been filed “has no further jurisdiction”). Diane R. did not appear on August 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13597 - 2005-03-31
has been filed “has no further jurisdiction”). Diane R. did not appear on August 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13597 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
approximate two-year experience with Gloria C., he did not think she was capable of meeting the daily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92439 - 2014-09-15
approximate two-year experience with Gloria C., he did not think she was capable of meeting the daily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92439 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Maria Margaret Cook v. Lenora Brockman, M.D.
of a default judgment constituted an erroneous exercise of discretion because the court did not consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2783 - 2017-09-19
of a default judgment constituted an erroneous exercise of discretion because the court did not consider
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2783 - 2017-09-19
State v. Crystal Carreon
to the jury. She told the police that a friend asked her to give three men, whom she claimed she did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26210 - 2006-08-14
to the jury. She told the police that a friend asked her to give three men, whom she claimed she did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26210 - 2006-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 16, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
that the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. We conclude the officer did have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27165 - 2006-11-15
that the arresting officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. We conclude the officer did have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27165 - 2006-11-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
a stool “by pressing on the vaginal and rectal areas, like they tried to pop a pimple.” He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26973 - 2014-09-15
a stool “by pressing on the vaginal and rectal areas, like they tried to pop a pimple.” He did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26973 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and did not constitute bullying. Renken also alleged that he was denied his right to a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763167 - 2024-02-13
and did not constitute bullying. Renken also alleged that he was denied his right to a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763167 - 2024-02-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
motor vehicle. We conclude the officer did not. We therefore reverse the circuit court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28697 - 2014-09-15
motor vehicle. We conclude the officer did not. We therefore reverse the circuit court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28697 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
challenges the judgment and order on grounds that the arresting officer did not have the requisite reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73001 - 2013-05-28
challenges the judgment and order on grounds that the arresting officer did not have the requisite reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73001 - 2013-05-28