Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59221 - 59230 of 61723 for judgment.
Search results 59221 - 59230 of 61723 for judgment.
[PDF]
State v. Felicia J.
] judgment for that of the factfinder.” State v. Saunders, 196 Wis. 2d 45, 54, 538 N.W.2d 546 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6389 - 2017-09-19
] judgment for that of the factfinder.” State v. Saunders, 196 Wis. 2d 45, 54, 538 N.W.2d 546 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6389 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
John O. Norquist v. Cate Zeuske
judgment. Dismissed without prejudice. ¶1 JON P. WILCOX, J. On June 25, 1996, John Norquist, mayor
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17126 - 2017-09-21
judgment. Dismissed without prejudice. ¶1 JON P. WILCOX, J. On June 25, 1996, John Norquist, mayor
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17126 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. [1] The notice of appeal refers to both the judgment of conviction and the postconviction order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35044 - 2008-12-29
. [1] The notice of appeal refers to both the judgment of conviction and the postconviction order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35044 - 2008-12-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be helpful in firming up the reasonableness of the officer’s judgments.” Secrist, 224 Wis. 2d at 216
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644960 - 2023-04-18
be helpful in firming up the reasonableness of the officer’s judgments.” Secrist, 224 Wis. 2d at 216
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644960 - 2023-04-18
COURT OF APPEALS
the judgment. See Auric v. Continental Cas. Co., 111 Wis. 2d 507, 516, 331 N.W.2d 325 (1983). [3] The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61234 - 2011-03-14
the judgment. See Auric v. Continental Cas. Co., 111 Wis. 2d 507, 516, 331 N.W.2d 325 (1983). [3] The State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61234 - 2011-03-14
[PDF]
Rodney A. Arneson v. Marcia Jezwinski
for summary judgment to dismiss the action on qualified-immunity grounds, arguing that the hearing “rights
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9174 - 2017-09-19
for summary judgment to dismiss the action on qualified-immunity grounds, arguing that the hearing “rights
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9174 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
professional judgment in the manner in which he or she represents the defendant. See id.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89383 - 2013-05-20
professional judgment in the manner in which he or she represents the defendant. See id.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89383 - 2013-05-20
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 22, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
judgment and support its decision by a written opinion, Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶9, we may affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27192 - 2006-11-21
judgment and support its decision by a written opinion, Allen, 274 Wis. 2d 568, ¶9, we may affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27192 - 2006-11-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“such impaired judgment … that there is a substantial probability of physical impairment or injury to himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300437 - 2020-10-29
“such impaired judgment … that there is a substantial probability of physical impairment or injury to himself
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300437 - 2020-10-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
if they are not supported by substantial evidence. WIS. STAT. § 102.23(6). We do not substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103081 - 2017-09-21
if they are not supported by substantial evidence. WIS. STAT. § 102.23(6). We do not substitute our judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103081 - 2017-09-21