Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59261 - 59270 of 63539 for records.
Search results 59261 - 59270 of 63539 for records.
State v. Ray A. Schiller
that during her review of records and other reports and her interview with Schiller, she “found no evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5854 - 2005-03-31
that during her review of records and other reports and her interview with Schiller, she “found no evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5854 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
could not use this document to show that Reyes testified falsely. [Record citations omitted.] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116147 - 2014-07-07
could not use this document to show that Reyes testified falsely. [Record citations omitted.] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116147 - 2014-07-07
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED June 28, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
, knowing or believing that it was cocaine. See Wis JI—Criminal 6020. The record supports the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66689 - 2011-06-27
, knowing or believing that it was cocaine. See Wis JI—Criminal 6020. The record supports the jury’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66689 - 2011-06-27
2007 WI APP 246
a plain-meaning interpretation of the statute). The drafting record shows that the word “adverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30511 - 2007-11-27
a plain-meaning interpretation of the statute). The drafting record shows that the word “adverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30511 - 2007-11-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Klieforth returned to his vehicle and checked Greenwood’s criminal and driving records. After doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263912 - 2020-06-09
Klieforth returned to his vehicle and checked Greenwood’s criminal and driving records. After doing so
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263912 - 2020-06-09
State v. Danny C. Eesley
. The Agreement does not define detainer. The congressional record states that “[a] detainer is a notification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12672 - 2005-03-31
. The Agreement does not define detainer. The congressional record states that “[a] detainer is a notification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12672 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
for this reason once or twice a year. The record does not support Dr. Hatfield’s assertion that Dr. Ackerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32834 - 2014-09-15
for this reason once or twice a year. The record does not support Dr. Hatfield’s assertion that Dr. Ackerman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32834 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not dispute there is sufficient evidence in the record to establish the first three elements of identity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75584 - 2014-09-15
not dispute there is sufficient evidence in the record to establish the first three elements of identity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=75584 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
name was on the license in Illinois, would not be challenged as an applicant based on his past record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31470 - 2008-01-09
name was on the license in Illinois, would not be challenged as an applicant based on his past record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31470 - 2008-01-09
COURT OF APPEALS
to entitle the movant to relief, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30085 - 2007-08-27
to entitle the movant to relief, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30085 - 2007-08-27