Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59271 - 59280 of 74898 for public records.
Search results 59271 - 59280 of 74898 for public records.
[PDF]
David A. Roeming v. Peterson Builders, Inc.
findings of fact on this question. Furthermore, the record supports the trial court’s findings. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13470 - 2017-09-21
findings of fact on this question. Furthermore, the record supports the trial court’s findings. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13470 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the remaining amount of the forfeiture. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135204 - 2017-09-21
the remaining amount of the forfeiture. After reviewing the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135204 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206941 - 2018-01-17
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206941 - 2018-01-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246771 - 2019-09-12
motion for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246771 - 2019-09-12
[PDF]
State v. George G. Kidd
Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694). In reviewing the record before us, we conclude that Kidd cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9997 - 2017-09-19
Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694). In reviewing the record before us, we conclude that Kidd cannot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9997 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. § 102.23(6).1 Our role on appeal is to search the record for evidence supporting the Commission’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36543 - 2014-09-15
. § 102.23(6).1 Our role on appeal is to search the record for evidence supporting the Commission’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36543 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
decision that denied postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660646 - 2023-05-31
decision that denied postconviction relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660646 - 2023-05-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counsel provided ineffective assistance at sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297558 - 2020-10-21
counsel provided ineffective assistance at sentencing. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=297558 - 2020-10-21
[PDF]
State v. Anthony Watkins
giving the instruction and that there was no evidence in the record to support giving the instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7642 - 2017-09-19
giving the instruction and that there was no evidence in the record to support giving the instruction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7642 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
considering the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242940 - 2019-06-26
considering the no-merit report and the response, and after conducting an independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242940 - 2019-06-26