Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59281 - 59290 of 65680 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 59281 - 59290 of 65680 for divorce records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
is not consistent with the record. In closing arguments, defense counsel argued Eugene had not been negligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29633 - 2007-07-09
is not consistent with the record. In closing arguments, defense counsel argued Eugene had not been negligent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29633 - 2007-07-09
State v. Kenny L. Warren
by the record and we will not disturb it. ¶13 The court found that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19322 - 2005-08-15
by the record and we will not disturb it. ¶13 The court found that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19322 - 2005-08-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
with accepted legal standards and the facts of record. Id. The admissibility of other-acts evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30008 - 2014-09-15
with accepted legal standards and the facts of record. Id. The admissibility of other-acts evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30008 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Ronald F. Zittlow
a trial court's discretionary decision if it examined the relevant facts of record, applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3002 - 2017-09-19
a trial court's discretionary decision if it examined the relevant facts of record, applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3002 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jill J. Kunish-Wolff
contention that trial counsel was deficient for not earlier examining Brown’s court record to ascertain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12311 - 2017-09-21
contention that trial counsel was deficient for not earlier examining Brown’s court record to ascertain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12311 - 2017-09-21
Mike Brolin v. Kim Bauers
as business records and were inadmissible hearsay. Further, Bauers finds error in the trial court’s exclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21508 - 2006-02-22
as business records and were inadmissible hearsay. Further, Bauers finds error in the trial court’s exclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21508 - 2006-02-22
State v. Javier Salgado
not know he had a constitutional right to testify. The record belies this claim. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2754 - 2005-03-31
not know he had a constitutional right to testify. The record belies this claim. ¶14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2754 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael V. Hendricks
to successfully reopen the judgment, it could affect his record and potentially have other consequences. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18615 - 2005-06-20
to successfully reopen the judgment, it could affect his record and potentially have other consequences. Thus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18615 - 2005-06-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
will become moot.” This court denied the stay motion on September 4, 2024. The record does not indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053715 - 2025-12-23
will become moot.” This court denied the stay motion on September 4, 2024. The record does not indicate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053715 - 2025-12-23
COURT OF APPEALS
in the record the factors it considered”; and (3) state “the rationale underlying its decision for imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92189 - 2013-01-28
in the record the factors it considered”; and (3) state “the rationale underlying its decision for imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92189 - 2013-01-28