Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59291 - 59300 of 84004 for simple case search.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
The facts in this case are undisputed. Therefore, whether the prosecutor’s remarks breached the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115126 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Lynn E. Salonen v. Duane G. Powers
285 (Ct. App. 1994) (citation omitted). In this case, the court found that Powers had engaged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2901 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
review.” 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122989 - 2014-10-08

COURT OF APPEALS
, will vary from case to case.” Id. We heed the Gallion court’s observation that “[t]he rule of law suffers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111778 - 2014-05-06

Lynelle V. Butkus v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
court’s judgment awarding her $3783 in a personal injury case. The issues are: (1) whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13097 - 2005-03-31

Forest County v. Michael R.
. After hearing testimony from both Chuck Burbank, a case manager, and Dr. Jeffrey Holmgren, Michael’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15602 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
will not be published. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. (2005-06). [1] In support of its case, Brookstone points
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29382 - 2007-06-13

[PDF] James C. Dillard, Sr. v. Gary McCaughtry
is not equated with preponderance of the evidence. There may be cases where two conflicting views may each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13394 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jeffrey M. Wesoloski
opportunity to discuss the case and the plea decision with him and that Wesoloski was satisfied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8198 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of two judges from the case because they knew the victims reflected prosecutorial or judicial bias
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33697 - 2008-08-11