Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5931 - 5940 of 69366 for as he.
Search results 5931 - 5940 of 69366 for as he.
State v. John Patrick Feeney
, Feeney told Sharon and her husband that he would go hear the boys’ prayers. ¶3 Feeney went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20657 - 2005-12-19
, Feeney told Sharon and her husband that he would go hear the boys’ prayers. ¶3 Feeney went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20657 - 2005-12-19
[PDF]
State v. Carter T. Hopson
after he pled guilty to one count of armed robbery with threat of force, contrary to WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6958 - 2017-09-20
after he pled guilty to one count of armed robbery with threat of force, contrary to WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6958 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
imprisonment and first-degree reckless injury. He argues that he was convicted on insufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125550 - 2014-11-04
imprisonment and first-degree reckless injury. He argues that he was convicted on insufficient evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125550 - 2014-11-04
State v. Larry L. Howard
: (1) he was “denied his constitutional right to due process, when he was forced to use two peremptory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18442 - 2005-06-06
: (1) he was “denied his constitutional right to due process, when he was forced to use two peremptory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18442 - 2005-06-06
[PDF]
State v. Edron D. Broomfield
. Lussow, Judge. Broomfield argues that he was denied his right to a fair and impartial jury because
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17215 - 2017-09-21
. Lussow, Judge. Broomfield argues that he was denied his right to a fair and impartial jury because
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17215 - 2017-09-21
State v. Todd W. Timblin
(1)(d) (1999-2000).[1] Timblin argues that he should be permitted to withdraw his guilty pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4894 - 2005-03-31
(1)(d) (1999-2000).[1] Timblin argues that he should be permitted to withdraw his guilty pleas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4894 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment convicting him of false imprisonment and first-degree reckless injury. He argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125550 - 2017-09-21
a judgment convicting him of false imprisonment and first-degree reckless injury. He argues that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125550 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, as a repeater. Bradley also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises various claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222252 - 2018-10-16
, as a repeater. Bradley also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion. He raises various claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=222252 - 2018-10-16
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(OWI). He contends that a blood test 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182796 - 2017-09-21
(OWI). He contends that a blood test 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=182796 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI App 40
plea withdrawal pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30 (2015-16). 1 Scott contends that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190470 - 2017-09-21
plea withdrawal pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.30 (2015-16). 1 Scott contends that he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190470 - 2017-09-21