Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5931 - 5940 of 29368 for er.
Search results 5931 - 5940 of 29368 for er.
Rodney Olson v. Joshua A. Berg
. Specifically, they claim the trial court erred when it prevented LaVonne from testifying about how the loss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3015 - 2005-03-31
. Specifically, they claim the trial court erred when it prevented LaVonne from testifying about how the loss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3015 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ruben F. Herrera
the denial of his postconviction motion to modify his sentence. Herrera argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7987 - 2005-03-31
the denial of his postconviction motion to modify his sentence. Herrera argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7987 - 2005-03-31
Family Services, Inc. v. Gary W.
Family Services also argues that the court erred by not allowing it to present evidence of Emma’s intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5922 - 2005-03-31
Family Services also argues that the court erred by not allowing it to present evidence of Emma’s intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5922 - 2005-03-31
Carol Peterson v. Marquette University
was clearly wrong. B. Recusal. We consider next whether the trial court erred
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8025 - 2005-03-31
was clearly wrong. B. Recusal. We consider next whether the trial court erred
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8025 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the No. 2015AP715-CR 5 court clearly erred in its fact finding. Tralmer contends that the testimony given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149931 - 2017-09-21
that the No. 2015AP715-CR 5 court clearly erred in its fact finding. Tralmer contends that the testimony given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149931 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
or, in the alternative, to suppress evidence. She contends that the court erred when it held that the officer had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32341 - 2008-04-08
or, in the alternative, to suppress evidence. She contends that the court erred when it held that the officer had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32341 - 2008-04-08
State v. Jackson D. Carpenter
after his parole ends. ¶13 Finally, Carpenter argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16060 - 2005-03-31
after his parole ends. ¶13 Finally, Carpenter argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16060 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence because the stop that led to his arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44984 - 2009-12-22
that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence because the stop that led to his arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44984 - 2009-12-22
COURT OF APPEALS
possession claim. She also argues that the circuit court erred in denying her motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134443 - 2015-02-04
possession claim. She also argues that the circuit court erred in denying her motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134443 - 2015-02-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that as a matter of appellate strategy, his postconviction counsel clearly erred by not raising the issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135068 - 2017-09-21
that as a matter of appellate strategy, his postconviction counsel clearly erred by not raising the issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135068 - 2017-09-21