Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59321 - 59330 of 84004 for simple case search.
Search results 59321 - 59330 of 84004 for simple case search.
State v. Frank E. Ratcliff
factors justifying a reduced sentence, counsel correctly notes that none are present in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12991 - 2005-03-31
factors justifying a reduced sentence, counsel correctly notes that none are present in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12991 - 2005-03-31
State v. Donnie L.B.
. Phillips Career Dev. Ctr., 167 Wis.2d 53, 66-67, 482 N.W.2d 60, 64 (1992), this is not such a case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14382 - 2005-03-31
. Phillips Career Dev. Ctr., 167 Wis.2d 53, 66-67, 482 N.W.2d 60, 64 (1992), this is not such a case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14382 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
argues that the third definition applies to his case: “Statements that were made under circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28734 - 2014-09-15
argues that the third definition applies to his case: “Statements that were made under circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28734 - 2014-09-15
State v. Frank S. Smith
. The trial court sentenced Smith to a four-year prison term. In doing so the court stated "and in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court sentenced Smith to a four-year prison term. In doing so the court stated "and in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David A. H.
its discretion when precluding the witness from testifying and affirm. ¶2 The charges in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3558 - 2017-09-19
its discretion when precluding the witness from testifying and affirm. ¶2 The charges in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3558 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668222 - 2023-06-12
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=668222 - 2023-06-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131447 - 2017-09-21
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131447 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212379 - 2018-05-03
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212379 - 2018-05-03
[PDF]
NOTICE
the IRA. Accordingly, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment. ¶2 In this case, the court awarded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60268 - 2014-09-15
the IRA. Accordingly, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment. ¶2 In this case, the court awarded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60268 - 2014-09-15
Todd Mc Greck v. County of Marathon
the facts shown on summary judgment. This case is unlike Cords v. Anderson, 80 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8943 - 2005-03-31
the facts shown on summary judgment. This case is unlike Cords v. Anderson, 80 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8943 - 2005-03-31