Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59351 - 59360 of 67070 for ct.

[PDF] State v. Rickey Eugene Pinkard
. See WIS. STAT. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2004AP2755-CR Cir. Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19522 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
that is justified by the record. See Gerald O. v. Cindy R., 203 Wis. 2d 148, 152, 551 N.W.2d 855 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161456 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of them is procedurally barred under either State v. Witkowski, 163 Wis. 2d 985, 990, 473 N.W.2d 512 (Ct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175699 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Wis. 2d 373, 379-80, 534 N.W.2d 624 (Ct. App. 1995). Neither counsel nor this court has identified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149272 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, 312, 395 N.W.2d 795 (Ct. App. 1986). The circuit court’s colloquy, buttressed by the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191760 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
n.4, 601 N.W.2d 865 (Ct. App. 1999). Here, the court reasonably considered Massie’s statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1030507 - 2025-10-29

[PDF] CA Blank Order
of Wolff v. Town Bd. of Weston, 156 Wis. 2d 588, 596, 457 N.W.2d 510 (Ct. App. 1990). Given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=884686 - 2024-12-04

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
); and State ex rel. McCoy v. Wisconsin Ct. of Appeals, 137 Wis. 2d 90, 403 N.W.2d 449 (1987), aff’d, 486 U.S
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916618 - 2025-02-19

[PDF] Janesville & Southeastern Railway Company v. Gardner Realty Corporation
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 03-0313 Cir. Ct. No. 01CV000598 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6133 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. § 808.10 and RULE 809.62. Appeal No. 2021AP18-CR Cir. Ct. No. 1999CF4849 STATE
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608146 - 2023-01-10