Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59351 - 59360 of 83855 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 59351 - 59360 of 83855 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Charles Jones
case pending” in which the judge before whom the case was pending “had specifically ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3374 - 2005-03-31
case pending” in which the judge before whom the case was pending “had specifically ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3374 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
supervision on three cases based on allegations that he: (1) spoke on the telephone, exchanged texts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102596 - 2017-09-21
supervision on three cases based on allegations that he: (1) spoke on the telephone, exchanged texts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102596 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
charge. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559435 - 2022-08-30
charge. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559435 - 2022-08-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156180 - 2017-09-21
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156180 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of this case that it would be inequitable to force Lila to forfeit her opportunity to exercise the option
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83314 - 2012-06-04
of this case that it would be inequitable to force Lila to forfeit her opportunity to exercise the option
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83314 - 2012-06-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The case proceeded to a jury trial. Before jury selection was completed, however, the parties reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880577 - 2024-11-26
. The case proceeded to a jury trial. Before jury selection was completed, however, the parties reached
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=880577 - 2024-11-26
[PDF]
State v. Mylea Wirkus
to a prior arrest for OWI, complaining that the officer in that case had made her wait for approximately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21671 - 2017-09-21
to a prior arrest for OWI, complaining that the officer in that case had made her wait for approximately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21671 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jaamal D. Bell
was deprived of hearing must be “important testimony that bore on an important issue of the case.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4927 - 2017-09-19
was deprived of hearing must be “important testimony that bore on an important issue of the case.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4927 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an “acknowledgement … that you understand what is happening in the case.” It concluded that his plea was knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181411 - 2017-09-21
an “acknowledgement … that you understand what is happening in the case.” It concluded that his plea was knowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181411 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
serve to corroborate the hearsay evidence. The cited cases provide that under the “beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68570 - 2014-09-15
serve to corroborate the hearsay evidence. The cited cases provide that under the “beyond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68570 - 2014-09-15