Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5951 - 5960 of 63678 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 5951 - 5960 of 63678 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
)(a). He contends the court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence due to an unlawful arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28636 - 2007-04-03
)(a). He contends the court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence due to an unlawful arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28636 - 2007-04-03
[PDF]
State v. John G. Anderson
his motion for a new trial. He argues that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16301 - 2017-09-21
his motion for a new trial. He argues that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16301 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jermaine M. Webb
County, Indiana, to interview Webb, a suspect, who was in custody. Webb told the officers that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10405 - 2017-09-20
County, Indiana, to interview Webb, a suspect, who was in custody. Webb told the officers that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10405 - 2017-09-20
State v. Jermaine M. Webb
that he went to Lake County, Indiana, to interview Webb, a suspect, who was in custody. Webb told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10405 - 2005-03-31
that he went to Lake County, Indiana, to interview Webb, a suspect, who was in custody. Webb told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10405 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
it denied his motion to suppress evidence due to an unlawful arrest. Specifically, Rabuck claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28636 - 2014-09-15
it denied his motion to suppress evidence due to an unlawful arrest. Specifically, Rabuck claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28636 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a custody classification decision by the Department of Corrections (DOC). Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=296383 - 2020-10-15
of a custody classification decision by the Department of Corrections (DOC). Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=296383 - 2020-10-15
Frontsheet
).[3] The court of appeals held that the circuit court erred in denying Purtell's motion to suppress
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118829 - 2014-07-31
).[3] The court of appeals held that the circuit court erred in denying Purtell's motion to suppress
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118829 - 2014-07-31
[PDF]
WI App 65
. The circuit court used the time stamps from the body camera in its decision granting the motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=413131 - 2021-10-12
. The circuit court used the time stamps from the body camera in its decision granting the motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=413131 - 2021-10-12
[PDF]
JD-1770; Short Term Detention - Pending Investigation/As a Consequence
conditions and possible sanctions, and the authority to take the juvenile into custody and hold without
/formdisplay/JD-1770.pdf?formNumber=JD-1770&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2024-08-15
conditions and possible sanctions, and the authority to take the juvenile into custody and hold without
/formdisplay/JD-1770.pdf?formNumber=JD-1770&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2024-08-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
his postconviction motions filed under WIS. STAT. ยง 974.06 (2013-14). 1 The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163177 - 2017-09-21
his postconviction motions filed under WIS. STAT. ยง 974.06 (2013-14). 1 The circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163177 - 2017-09-21