Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5951 - 5960 of 59293 for quit claim deed.

State v. Kenosha County Board of Adjustment
, the DNR rested its objection on its claims that Huntoon had not established hardship
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10761 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Ted W. Urdahl
speedy trial claim. For the reasons we explain in the opinion, we do not decide whether the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19002 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jennifer E. Francis
, responsive and cooperative with all aspects of the interview procedures” and “was quite conversational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18558 - 2005-07-26

[PDF] Frontsheet
or require with respect to a client. ¶16 In disputing the claimed SCR 20:1.9(c)(1) violation alleged
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792486 - 2024-04-24

[PDF] Chris Gentilli v. The Board of Police and Fire Commissioners of the City of Madison
claims and remanded the certiorari proceeding. Id., ¶3. The court reasoned that Gentilli could pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25062 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jennifer E. Francis
aspects of the interview procedures” and “was quite conversational and, thus, an easy source of relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18558 - 2017-09-21

State v. Ted W. Urdahl
for purposes of analyzing Urdahl’s speedy trial claim. For the reasons we explain in the opinion, we do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19002 - 2005-08-30

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
agreed that he, along with Walt and Adam, went in Wouts’s office “quite a bit.” (As discussed in more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=544109 - 2022-07-14

[PDF] WI App 12
a claim that his pretrial detention without an attorney violated his due process rights. Lee asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=326021 - 2021-04-26

Francis Penterman, Sr. v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
, John A. Des Jardins, Judge. The circuit court dismissed the claims of Francis Penterman, Sr. and Ruth
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17086 - 2005-03-31