Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59541 - 59550 of 63537 for records.
Search results 59541 - 59550 of 63537 for records.
State v. John C. Thorstad
not refuse to take the test, nor does the record reveal that he gave any indication that he would prefer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15717 - 2005-03-31
not refuse to take the test, nor does the record reveal that he gave any indication that he would prefer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15717 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was raised below and the Chamberlains have not directed us to a location in the record where this argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95946 - 2013-04-24
was raised below and the Chamberlains have not directed us to a location in the record where this argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95946 - 2013-04-24
Waukesha County v. Steven H.
their parental rights terminated. Both Steven and Amy were present in court that day and the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14674 - 2005-03-31
their parental rights terminated. Both Steven and Amy were present in court that day and the record shows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14674 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
appealed from, even in the absence of a proper objection, “if it appears from the record that the real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88800 - 2012-10-29
appealed from, even in the absence of a proper objection, “if it appears from the record that the real
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88800 - 2012-10-29
[PDF]
WI APP 45
ruled in Littlejohn’s favor, we will assume fact finding, reasonably inferable from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31434 - 2014-09-15
ruled in Littlejohn’s favor, we will assume fact finding, reasonably inferable from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31434 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“the record never makes clear how [Bland] does in fact match the description given.” As we have seen, Graham
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91694 - 2014-09-15
“the record never makes clear how [Bland] does in fact match the description given.” As we have seen, Graham
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91694 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
any other electronic means, monitoring or recording the activities of the victim. This subdivision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422824 - 2021-09-09
any other electronic means, monitoring or recording the activities of the victim. This subdivision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=422824 - 2021-09-09
[PDF]
NOTICE
will sustain an evidentiary ruling if the record shows that the trial court examined relevant facts, applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35061 - 2014-09-15
will sustain an evidentiary ruling if the record shows that the trial court examined relevant facts, applied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35061 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
applied the proper legal standard in accordance with the facts of record to reach a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377513 - 2021-06-15
applied the proper legal standard in accordance with the facts of record to reach a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=377513 - 2021-06-15
[PDF]
State v. Martin Anthony Azevedo
that, based on the record made at the suppression hearing, Azevedo’s performance on the one-legged stand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4695 - 2017-09-19
that, based on the record made at the suppression hearing, Azevedo’s performance on the one-legged stand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4695 - 2017-09-19