Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59551 - 59560 of 63539 for records.
Search results 59551 - 59560 of 63539 for records.
State v. Eileen M. Entringer
the principal facts and inferences are undisputed, the appellate court may review the factual record and decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3057 - 2005-03-31
the principal facts and inferences are undisputed, the appellate court may review the factual record and decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3057 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Waukesha County v. Steven H.
present in court that day and the record shows adequate evidence that the trial court gave both parents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14674 - 2017-09-21
present in court that day and the record shows adequate evidence that the trial court gave both parents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14674 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Keith M. Carey
attorney for the county in which that court is located and the person’s attorney of record in the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6585 - 2017-09-19
attorney for the county in which that court is located and the person’s attorney of record in the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6585 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Keith M. Carey
attorney for the county in which that court is located and the person’s attorney of record in the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6584 - 2017-09-19
attorney for the county in which that court is located and the person’s attorney of record in the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6584 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 752.35, this court may order a new trial “if it appears from the record that the real controversy has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725520 - 2023-11-08
. § 752.35, this court may order a new trial “if it appears from the record that the real controversy has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=725520 - 2023-11-08
State v. Barry A. Kundert
. The record does not disclose whether it was seized as evidence. The .22 caliber handgun was not listed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12778 - 2005-03-31
. The record does not disclose whether it was seized as evidence. The .22 caliber handgun was not listed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12778 - 2005-03-31
State v. William S. Cherry
allegations; or the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4389 - 2005-03-31
allegations; or the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4389 - 2005-03-31
WI App 143 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP2245 Complete Title o...
records. Ashker’s action did not fall within the enumerated list of events that would allow Aurora
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104279 - 2014-04-14
records. Ashker’s action did not fall within the enumerated list of events that would allow Aurora
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104279 - 2014-04-14
Robert Tomaszewski v. David Giera
to the record presented to the tribunal whose decision is under review. Klinger v. Oneida County, 149 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5643 - 2005-03-31
to the record presented to the tribunal whose decision is under review. Klinger v. Oneida County, 149 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5643 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
suggests, without any citation to the record, that it is reasonable to infer that the reason the G2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101280 - 2017-09-21
suggests, without any citation to the record, that it is reasonable to infer that the reason the G2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101280 - 2017-09-21