Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59561 - 59570 of 82981 for simple case search.
Search results 59561 - 59570 of 82981 for simple case search.
State v. James L. Kirk
to a crime. It is thus inapplicable to this case. Kirk also contends that he could not be guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6644 - 2005-03-31
to a crime. It is thus inapplicable to this case. Kirk also contends that he could not be guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6644 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333728 - 2021-02-11
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=333728 - 2021-02-11
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Phillip Ries
whether the three traditional sentencing factors have ever been meaningfully considered in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9620 - 2017-09-19
whether the three traditional sentencing factors have ever been meaningfully considered in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9620 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
cites no statute or case saying that travel out of state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68131 - 2014-09-15
cites no statute or case saying that travel out of state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68131 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165194 - 2017-09-21
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165194 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case.” This argument essentially challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59563 - 2011-01-31
in this case.” This argument essentially challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59563 - 2011-01-31
State v. David Womble
never alerted him to the possibility of a longer sentence, and never discussed the merits of his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11158 - 2005-03-31
never alerted him to the possibility of a longer sentence, and never discussed the merits of his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11158 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2015AP2331-FT 2 We refer to the procedural history of this case only as necessary to illuminate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171651 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2015AP2331-FT 2 We refer to the procedural history of this case only as necessary to illuminate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171651 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jovan T. Mull
. The cases were joined over Mull’s objection. ¶3 At the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6794 - 2005-03-31
. The cases were joined over Mull’s objection. ¶3 At the preliminary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6794 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
version unless otherwise noted. [2] This case is distinguishable from our recent decision in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27034 - 2006-11-06
version unless otherwise noted. [2] This case is distinguishable from our recent decision in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27034 - 2006-11-06