Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5961 - 5970 of 61013 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 5961 - 5970 of 61013 for quit claim deed/1000.
CA Blank Order
concludes that there would be “no basis for claiming that Mark [E.] was not advised of his procedural rights
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100492 - 2013-08-04
concludes that there would be “no basis for claiming that Mark [E.] was not advised of his procedural rights
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100492 - 2013-08-04
[PDF]
State v. Brian A. Patterson
on this basis obviates the need to address Patterson’s ineffective-assistance claim. See Gross v. Hoffman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5216 - 2017-09-19
on this basis obviates the need to address Patterson’s ineffective-assistance claim. See Gross v. Hoffman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5216 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and denied the petition for discharge. On appeal, Purifoy makes four claims of error against the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79675 - 2012-03-19
and denied the petition for discharge. On appeal, Purifoy makes four claims of error against the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=79675 - 2012-03-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Grube, my intention, quite frankly, was to look at sentencing you to prison for two to three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71143 - 2011-09-20
. Grube, my intention, quite frankly, was to look at sentencing you to prison for two to three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71143 - 2011-09-20
[PDF]
Guadalupe Mendoya v. Brown County
the influence of alcohol and drugs." Mendoya signed the form. In his affidavit and brief, Mendoya claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13909 - 2014-09-15
the influence of alcohol and drugs." Mendoya signed the form. In his affidavit and brief, Mendoya claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13909 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
¶1 KESSLER, J.1 Richard J. Nastal, pro se, appeals from a small claims judgment in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36878 - 2014-09-15
¶1 KESSLER, J.1 Richard J. Nastal, pro se, appeals from a small claims judgment in favor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36878 - 2014-09-15
Guadalupe Mendoya v. Brown County
." Mendoya signed the form. In his affidavit and brief, Mendoya claims that he consumed twenty-five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13909 - 2005-03-31
." Mendoya signed the form. In his affidavit and brief, Mendoya claims that he consumed twenty-five
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13909 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of these claims; he could have raised them all. In any event, a hearing was set but Campbell affirmatively
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185371 - 2017-09-21
of these claims; he could have raised them all. In any event, a hearing was set but Campbell affirmatively
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185371 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rented from Runamuk. 1 The circuit court rejected Runamuk’s claim for damages, following a bench
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207816 - 2018-01-30
rented from Runamuk. 1 The circuit court rejected Runamuk’s claim for damages, following a bench
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207816 - 2018-01-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a postconviction order that denied those claims without a hearing. State v. Smith (Smith I), No. 2021AP72-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995220 - 2025-08-12
a postconviction order that denied those claims without a hearing. State v. Smith (Smith I), No. 2021AP72-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=995220 - 2025-08-12