Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59631 - 59640 of 84004 for simple case search.
Search results 59631 - 59640 of 84004 for simple case search.
Jefferson County Department of Human Services v. Volonna W.
specifically revised, the dispositional order in this case is reconfirmed and incorporated into this order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13211 - 2005-03-31
specifically revised, the dispositional order in this case is reconfirmed and incorporated into this order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13211 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to show what an investigation would have revealed or how it would have altered the case. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247599 - 2019-10-01
to show what an investigation would have revealed or how it would have altered the case. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247599 - 2019-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
2007 WI App 35 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP2347 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28181 - 2007-03-27
2007 WI App 35 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2005AP2347 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28181 - 2007-03-27
Nancy M. White v. Jeffrey A. White
must decide which inference to draw). Indeed, Mr. White’s trial lawyer argued, “[T]his is a case where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2897 - 2005-03-31
must decide which inference to draw). Indeed, Mr. White’s trial lawyer argued, “[T]his is a case where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2897 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was required. The ongoing case manager informed the court that she had spoken to K.J. the day before
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=547805 - 2022-07-26
was required. The ongoing case manager informed the court that she had spoken to K.J. the day before
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=547805 - 2022-07-26
[PDF]
Mary Ellyn Doerr v. Charles A. Doerr
of the case because of the combined forms of placement it was ordering. It set child support at $950 per
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10132 - 2017-09-19
of the case because of the combined forms of placement it was ordering. It set child support at $950 per
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10132 - 2017-09-19
Jefferson County Department of Human Services v. Volonna W.
specifically revised, the dispositional order in this case is reconfirmed and incorporated into this order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13213 - 2005-03-31
specifically revised, the dispositional order in this case is reconfirmed and incorporated into this order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13213 - 2005-03-31
State v. Russell L. Dibble
2002 WI App 219 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0538-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4988 - 2005-03-31
2002 WI App 219 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0538-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4988 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
been stipulated. Jones agreed that he was on bond in three felony cases with the condition that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165485 - 2017-09-21
been stipulated. Jones agreed that he was on bond in three felony cases with the condition that he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165485 - 2017-09-21
State v. Nicholas D. Kasten
that the best case scenario that we had would be for The Court to withhold sentence, or impose and stay, place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7583 - 2005-03-31
that the best case scenario that we had would be for The Court to withhold sentence, or impose and stay, place
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7583 - 2005-03-31