Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59641 - 59650 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.

COURT OF APPEALS
this credibility determination cannot serve to corroborate the hearsay evidence. The cited cases provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68570 - 2011-07-25

[PDF] NOTICE
first appeal sets forth the basic facts of the case as follows: The charges arose out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33744 - 2014-09-15

State v. Rucker Detective Agency
before me this morning is—doesn’t qualify this case as far as coming within the statute
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12924 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
in this case is clearly erroneous. Rather, Union Cab argues that the court “gave insufficient weight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=126112 - 2014-11-05

John F. Hernandez v. Patrick E. Behrndt
ones. ¶7 The law is clear regarding how a losing party in a small claims case may demand a de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3515 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joseph S. Barfoot
on hindsight. Rather, the case is reviewed from counsel’s perspective at the time of trial, and the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15713 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for 2 Shortly thereafter, in an inverse of the eviction case, George and members of the church sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240674 - 2019-05-15

COURT OF APPEALS
to an in camera review of documents withheld during discovery. This is not a case involving confidential records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58602 - 2013-03-20

COURT OF APPEALS
reject Pryes’s reliance on numerous cases from other states in which the facts differ significantly from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36724 - 2009-06-09

State v. Robert E. Irish
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96‑2303
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11250 - 2014-10-21