Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59681 - 59690 of 83778 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 59681 - 59690 of 83778 for simple case search/1000.
State v. Frank S. Smith
. The trial court sentenced Smith to a four-year prison term. In doing so the court stated "and in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court sentenced Smith to a four-year prison term. In doing so the court stated "and in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8921 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).2 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=406615 - 2021-08-11
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).2 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=406615 - 2021-08-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for summary judgment and that “[t]he Court hereby orders this case dismissed.” Thus, it appears the March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58040 - 2014-09-15
for summary judgment and that “[t]he Court hereby orders this case dismissed.” Thus, it appears the March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58040 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert J. Auchinleck v. Town of LaGrange
2 PER CURIAM. Robert J. Auchinleck appeals from an order dismissing his open meetings case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12102 - 2017-09-21
2 PER CURIAM. Robert J. Auchinleck appeals from an order dismissing his open meetings case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12102 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gabriel J. Alwin
intensive sanctions inappropriate in this case. Alwin argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10868 - 2005-03-31
intensive sanctions inappropriate in this case. Alwin argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10868 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926616 - 2025-03-12
and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926616 - 2025-03-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245495 - 2019-08-20
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245495 - 2019-08-20
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=915572 - 2025-02-12
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=915572 - 2025-02-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
supporting the motion to determine whether the moving party has made a prima facie case. Kraemer Bros. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40640 - 2014-09-15
supporting the motion to determine whether the moving party has made a prima facie case. Kraemer Bros. v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40640 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the remaining counts from this case and another case be dismissed and read in. The State also agreed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865575 - 2024-10-22
that the remaining counts from this case and another case be dismissed and read in. The State also agreed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865575 - 2024-10-22