Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59691 - 59700 of 83430 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 59691 - 59700 of 83430 for simple case search/1000.
CA Blank Order
subject to appellate review. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122148 - 2014-09-22
subject to appellate review. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122148 - 2014-09-22
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053216 - 2025-12-17
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053216 - 2025-12-17
Clarence 2X Price v. Ken Morgan
. The State argues that habeas corpus was not a remedy properly available to Price in this case. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10172 - 2005-03-31
. The State argues that habeas corpus was not a remedy properly available to Price in this case. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10172 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rodney C.M.
from the state. ¶2 An original dispositional order was entered in this case on March 16, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5728 - 2005-03-31
from the state. ¶2 An original dispositional order was entered in this case on March 16, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5728 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
this case dismissed.” Thus, it appears the March 26 Decision and Order was the Wis. Stat. § 808.03(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58040 - 2012-01-18
this case dismissed.” Thus, it appears the March 26 Decision and Order was the Wis. Stat. § 808.03(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58040 - 2012-01-18
CA Blank Order
) Before Gundrum, J.[1] In these consolidated cases, Randy L. Bolstad appeals from an order for commitment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120486 - 2014-09-02
) Before Gundrum, J.[1] In these consolidated cases, Randy L. Bolstad appeals from an order for commitment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120486 - 2014-09-02
COURT OF APPEALS
nineteen years later, Jacobs filed a motion in the refusal case in Milwaukee County Circuit Court, entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70217 - 2011-08-29
nineteen years later, Jacobs filed a motion in the refusal case in Milwaukee County Circuit Court, entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70217 - 2011-08-29
State v. Randy J. Krueger
convictions, the judgment of conviction is affirmed. The facts in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11489 - 2005-03-31
convictions, the judgment of conviction is affirmed. The facts in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11489 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
the IRA. Accordingly, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment. ¶2 In this case, the court awarded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60268 - 2014-09-15
the IRA. Accordingly, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment. ¶2 In this case, the court awarded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=60268 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
and Stewart appealed. We concluded that the plea colloquy was defective and remanded the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56193 - 2014-09-15
and Stewart appealed. We concluded that the plea colloquy was defective and remanded the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56193 - 2014-09-15