Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59731 - 59740 of 63577 for records.
Search results 59731 - 59740 of 63577 for records.
Frontsheet
and the record reveals no extraordinary circumstances to justify the reduction of costs.[10] ¶22 IT IS ORDERED
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66463 - 2011-06-22
and the record reveals no extraordinary circumstances to justify the reduction of costs.[10] ¶22 IT IS ORDERED
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66463 - 2011-06-22
2009 WI APP 119
standards, in which case we know of no reason why a court may not reach back into its own record. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37172 - 2009-08-25
standards, in which case we know of no reason why a court may not reach back into its own record. Our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37172 - 2009-08-25
State v. Miguel Angel Santana-Lopez
“‘in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” State v. Pharr, 115
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15279 - 2005-03-31
“‘in accordance with accepted legal standards and in accordance with the facts of record.’” State v. Pharr, 115
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15279 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief, the circuit court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778370 - 2024-03-26
, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled to relief, the circuit court has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=778370 - 2024-03-26
[PDF]
State v. Earl Steele III
was voluntarily, intelligently, and knowingly entered. Id. For the State to meet this burden, the record must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2174 - 2017-09-19
was voluntarily, intelligently, and knowingly entered. Id. For the State to meet this burden, the record must
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2174 - 2017-09-19
2008 WI APP 45
favor, we will assume fact finding, reasonably inferable from the record, that is most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31434 - 2008-03-18
favor, we will assume fact finding, reasonably inferable from the record, that is most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31434 - 2008-03-18
State v. John M. Kieffer
a presumption of compulsion.” Id. at 314. Because the suppression hearing record does not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10193 - 2005-03-31
a presumption of compulsion.” Id. at 314. Because the suppression hearing record does not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10193 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dunn County Department of Human Services v. LaMoine S.
the record for evidence to support the court's findings of fact, and will not overturn the court's findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10997 - 2017-09-19
the record for evidence to support the court's findings of fact, and will not overturn the court's findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10997 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Shane M. Kringen
down and tell Kringen the figure. Therefore, the record supports the conclusion that Kringen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5791 - 2017-09-19
down and tell Kringen the figure. Therefore, the record supports the conclusion that Kringen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5791 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. See Majority, ¶10. The majority points to no facts in the record suggesting such a notion. ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32593 - 2014-09-15
. See Majority, ¶10. The majority points to no facts in the record suggesting such a notion. ¶17
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32593 - 2014-09-15