Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59751 - 59760 of 83951 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 59751 - 59760 of 83951 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
NOTICE
are to the 2007-08 version unless otherwise noted. 2 During the pendency of Amber’s case, the biological
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47198 - 2014-09-15
are to the 2007-08 version unless otherwise noted. 2 During the pendency of Amber’s case, the biological
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47198 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Anne E. Czarnecki v. Paul A. Czarnecki
psychologist Dr. Itzhak Matusiak to remain on the case; (3) the written order finds that Paul A. Czarnecki
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10281 - 2017-09-20
psychologist Dr. Itzhak Matusiak to remain on the case; (3) the written order finds that Paul A. Czarnecki
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10281 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Jaamal D. Bell
was deprived of hearing must be “important testimony that bore on an important issue of the case.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4927 - 2017-09-19
was deprived of hearing must be “important testimony that bore on an important issue of the case.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4927 - 2017-09-19
Cynthia A. Schultz v. Charles J. Sykes
for reconsideration expired and Schultz had exhausted her appeals, our opinion became the law of the case, precluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6296 - 2010-08-24
for reconsideration expired and Schultz had exhausted her appeals, our opinion became the law of the case, precluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6296 - 2010-08-24
Scott G. Biesterveld v. Mark W. Roob
the first hearing, Roob filed no written response to the motion for default judgment. That being the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3122 - 2005-03-31
the first hearing, Roob filed no written response to the motion for default judgment. That being the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3122 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the basic facts of the case as follows: The charges arose out of a confrontation between two groups
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33744 - 2008-08-13
the basic facts of the case as follows: The charges arose out of a confrontation between two groups
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33744 - 2008-08-13
COURT OF APPEALS
in his case. ¶8 Tabat points to the following portion of the circuit court’s remarks to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59003 - 2011-01-18
in his case. ¶8 Tabat points to the following portion of the circuit court’s remarks to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59003 - 2011-01-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not argue that the circuit court’s finding that a mutual mistake did not occur in this case is clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126112 - 2017-09-21
not argue that the circuit court’s finding that a mutual mistake did not occur in this case is clearly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=126112 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to comprehend his case. Medina’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim is based, in part, on his allegation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599336 - 2022-12-13
to comprehend his case. Medina’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim is based, in part, on his allegation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599336 - 2022-12-13
State v. Charles Jones
case pending” in which the judge before whom the case was pending “had specifically ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3374 - 2005-05-09
case pending” in which the judge before whom the case was pending “had specifically ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3374 - 2005-05-09