Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59771 - 59780 of 74688 for public records.
Search results 59771 - 59780 of 74688 for public records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804071 - 2024-05-21
for sentence modification. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=804071 - 2024-05-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
because it is not a reasonable reading of the record. While Pegeese is technically correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214590 - 2018-06-21
because it is not a reasonable reading of the record. While Pegeese is technically correct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214590 - 2018-06-21
[PDF]
Anderson B. Connor v. Sara Connor
to Polich’s credibility. ¶6 The record supports the trial court’s findings that Polich’s affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15019 - 2017-09-21
to Polich’s credibility. ¶6 The record supports the trial court’s findings that Polich’s affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15019 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James R.K.
. § 805.04(1). The record does not establish whether the motions for dismissal were filed prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4445 - 2017-09-19
. § 805.04(1). The record does not establish whether the motions for dismissal were filed prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4445 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Waushara County Department of Human Services v. Jacob A.S.
the facts of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way to a rational conclusion. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2139 - 2017-09-19
the facts of record under the proper legal standard and reasons its way to a rational conclusion. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2139 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=527012 - 2022-06-01
of the records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=527012 - 2022-06-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
an independent review of the record, as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35937 - 2014-09-15
an independent review of the record, as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45 (1967
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35937 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Andrew R. Molzahn
—and our review of the record shows no concrete evidence of this—we conclude that there was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3453 - 2017-09-19
—and our review of the record shows no concrete evidence of this—we conclude that there was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3453 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Robert M. Balistreri v. City of Madison
are explained in detail and fully supported by his analysis and by the record submitted at the hearings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9724 - 2017-09-19
are explained in detail and fully supported by his analysis and by the record submitted at the hearings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9724 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92965 - 2014-09-15
conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is not entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92965 - 2014-09-15