Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5981 - 5990 of 83278 for case search.
Search results 5981 - 5990 of 83278 for case search.
City of Horicon v. Karl K. Albert
did not violate Albert’s constitutional rights because it did not constitute a “search” or “seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15273 - 2005-03-31
did not violate Albert’s constitutional rights because it did not constitute a “search” or “seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15273 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brian L. Edwards
for operating after revocation. The officer performed a "pat-down" search of Edwards at the scene but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8153 - 2017-09-19
for operating after revocation. The officer performed a "pat-down" search of Edwards at the scene but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8153 - 2017-09-19
City of Horicon v. Karl K. Albert
did not violate Albert’s constitutional rights because it did not constitute a “search” or “seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15274 - 2005-03-31
did not violate Albert’s constitutional rights because it did not constitute a “search” or “seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15274 - 2005-03-31
State v. John A. Mosley, Sr.
, and underlies the charge to which Mosley pled guilty. The officer did not have a search warrant, and Mosley did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12089 - 2005-03-31
, and underlies the charge to which Mosley pled guilty. The officer did not have a search warrant, and Mosley did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12089 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John A. Mosley, Sr.
to which Mosley pled guilty. The officer did not have a search warrant, and Mosley did not consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12089 - 2017-09-21
to which Mosley pled guilty. The officer did not have a search warrant, and Mosley did not consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12089 - 2017-09-21
State v. Deon McGraw
vehicle search. We reject these arguments and therefore affirm McGraw’s conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11622 - 2005-03-31
vehicle search. We reject these arguments and therefore affirm McGraw’s conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11622 - 2005-03-31
Wisconsin Court System - Headlines archive
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=258&year=2011
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/news/archives/view.jsp?id=258&year=2011
Frontsheet
2010 WI 112 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2010AP1118-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54224 - 2010-09-07
2010 WI 112 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2010AP1118-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54224 - 2010-09-07
[PDF]
State v. Jacob W. Hatcher
. Background ¶2 The facts of this case are undisputed. At 11:59 p.m. on June 26, 2001, officer Chris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5746 - 2017-09-19
. Background ¶2 The facts of this case are undisputed. At 11:59 p.m. on June 26, 2001, officer Chris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5746 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a search warrant. Smith was found to have a blood alcohol concentration of .273. Smith filed a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615610 - 2023-02-01
a search warrant. Smith was found to have a blood alcohol concentration of .273. Smith filed a motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=615610 - 2023-02-01