Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5981 - 5990 of 73980 for public records.
Search results 5981 - 5990 of 73980 for public records.
Rule Order
. No. 09-02 In the matter of amendment of Supreme Court Rule 72.01 regarding record retention. FILED
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48648 - 2010-03-31
. No. 09-02 In the matter of amendment of Supreme Court Rule 72.01 regarding record retention. FILED
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48648 - 2010-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the record and the briefs, and after hearing oral arguments, we conclude that this matter should
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586766 - 2022-11-04
the record and the briefs, and after hearing oral arguments, we conclude that this matter should
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586766 - 2022-11-04
State v. James R. Brownson
conviction. Because the condition of probation is reasonably related to protecting the public from fraud
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9148 - 2005-03-31
conviction. Because the condition of probation is reasonably related to protecting the public from fraud
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9148 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was not in the public interest. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION ¶5 To be considered for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110195 - 2017-09-21
was not in the public interest. This appeal follows. DISCUSSION ¶5 To be considered for sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110195 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Robert C. Wagnon
the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary factors to be considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6998 - 2017-09-20
the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. The primary factors to be considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6998 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
that sentence adjustment was not in the public interest. This appeal follows. Discussion ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110195 - 2014-04-14
that sentence adjustment was not in the public interest. This appeal follows. Discussion ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110195 - 2014-04-14
State v. Robert C. Wagnon
is presumed to have acted reasonably and the defendant has the burden to show unreasonableness from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6998 - 2005-03-31
is presumed to have acted reasonably and the defendant has the burden to show unreasonableness from the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6998 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107386 - 2014-01-27
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107386 - 2014-01-27
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92545 - 2013-02-11
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92545 - 2013-02-11
CA Blank Order
to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104032 - 2013-11-12
to respond to the report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104032 - 2013-11-12