Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59851 - 59860 of 83878 for simple case search/1000.

CA Blank Order
. In these consolidated cases, Sergio L. Ratliff appeals from two judgments of conviction. Ratliff’s appellate counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147480 - 2015-09-01

[PDF] CA Blank Order
case, the same judge presides at both proceedings, we will consider the original sentencing reasons
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205968 - 2017-12-27

[PDF] Mark J. Santner v. David H. Schwarz
. 2 State ex rel. Jones was a parole revocation case, but its reasoning applies equally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3489 - 2017-09-20

State v. Jesse E. Voss
the clerk receives his request within the ten-day period, which he failed to do in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9737 - 2005-03-31

[MS WORD] GN-4120: Findings and Order Continuing Protective Placement - Order for Protective Services (Annual Review)
Services (Annual Review of Protective Placement) Case No. A Petition for Annual Review
/formdisplay/GN-4120.doc?formNumber=GN-4120&formType=Form&formatId=1&language=en - 2019-11-11

State v. Judy A. Garbow Swanson
, 451 N.W.2d 752 (1990). Swanson’s case was tried before a jury, and this court concludes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25213 - 2006-05-22

[PDF] State v. Richard A. Hallada
disagree. ¶7 Whether probable cause exists based on the facts of a given case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21435 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
. Ziegler, 2006 WI App 49, ¶23, 289 Wis. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96378 - 2013-05-07

State v. Nathaniel A. Lindell
for a trial court to review claims in a case with which it is already familiar. Second, the order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5211 - 2005-03-31

State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
to inmates who were sentenced prior to its effective date is an issue currently pending in another case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6416 - 2005-03-31