Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5991 - 6000 of 24443 for extending.
Search results 5991 - 6000 of 24443 for extending.
Randall Seltrecht v. Christine A. Bremer
within which the action must be brought cannot be extended more than 5 years by any such disability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11130 - 2005-03-31
within which the action must be brought cannot be extended more than 5 years by any such disability
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11130 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
years in prison and one year extended supervision. A PSI was ordered. No. 2016AP918-CR 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192128 - 2017-09-21
years in prison and one year extended supervision. A PSI was ordered. No. 2016AP918-CR 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192128 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
.” Furthermore, there is no indication of when Jaa’la is to receive this extended passing time, and thus her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68667 - 2011-07-27
.” Furthermore, there is no indication of when Jaa’la is to receive this extended passing time, and thus her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68667 - 2011-07-27
State v. Derrick C. Montriel
in prison, with eight years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision.[2] After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7289 - 2005-03-31
in prison, with eight years of initial confinement and four years of extended supervision.[2] After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7289 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael B. Borhegyi
] to extend the reach of the amendment [speedy trial provision] to the period prior to arrest.” A subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13676 - 2005-03-31
] to extend the reach of the amendment [speedy trial provision] to the period prior to arrest.” A subsequent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13676 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2 We extended R.J.’s appeal deadlines twice, first due to the State Public Defender’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277916 - 2020-08-13
. 2 We extended R.J.’s appeal deadlines twice, first due to the State Public Defender’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=277916 - 2020-08-13
[PDF]
Frontsheet
), Arberry was sentenced to one year initial confinement and two years extended supervision, to be served
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207250 - 2018-01-19
), Arberry was sentenced to one year initial confinement and two years extended supervision, to be served
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207250 - 2018-01-19
WI App 81 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2012AP1528 Complete Title of...
orders, · whether to extend the period of time for the Nelsons to redeem their real property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96965 - 2013-06-25
orders, · whether to extend the period of time for the Nelsons to redeem their real property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96965 - 2013-06-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, extended supervision left up to the circuit court’s discretion, and that the State and Clayborn were free
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=839893 - 2024-08-20
, extended supervision left up to the circuit court’s discretion, and that the State and Clayborn were free
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=839893 - 2024-08-20
State v. Chad W. Ziegler
to twenty-one years of confinement, followed by consecutive periods of extended supervision of three to four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21177 - 2006-03-22
to twenty-one years of confinement, followed by consecutive periods of extended supervision of three to four
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21177 - 2006-03-22