Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 5991 - 6000 of 83389 for simple case search.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a trial. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In January 2013, police executed a no-knock search warrant at 1608
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147788 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
) the blood draw violated the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245227 - 2019-08-15

Wisconsin Court System - Circuit court forms
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/forms1/circuit/ccform.jsp?Category=12&FormName=&FormNumber=&StatuteCite=&SubCat=All&beg_date=&end_date=&page=2

Wisconsin Court System - Supreme Court history - famous cases of the Supreme Court
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/courts/supreme/famouscases.htm - 2026-02-21

Wisconsin Court System - eFile/eCourts
history Employment Current openings Court reporter information Law clerk information Benefits Case Search
/ecourts/efilecircuit/eupdates/eupdate17.htm - 2026-02-21

State v. Michael J. Farrell
was in error because a breath test was available, and therefore the blood test was an unreasonable search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3532 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Michael J. Farrell
was available, and therefore the blood test was an unreasonable search and seizure. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3532 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. George W. Allen
a search warrant. Because of the affidavit's stale, irrelevant and conclusory averments, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8724 - 2017-09-19

State v. Reuben Adams
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11639 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Reuben Adams
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-3136 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11639 - 2017-09-19