Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59921 - 59930 of 61723 for judgment.
Search results 59921 - 59930 of 61723 for judgment.
Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc.
factual differences between the two cases, the Commission concluded on cross-motions for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21209 - 2006-03-22
factual differences between the two cases, the Commission concluded on cross-motions for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21209 - 2006-03-22
[PDF]
The State asks us to reverse the order that vacated Jarvi’s judgment of conviction and granted a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969416 - 2025-06-12
The State asks us to reverse the order that vacated Jarvi’s judgment of conviction and granted a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=969416 - 2025-06-12
[PDF]
State v. Jason J. Trawitzki
. Accordingly, we affirm the court of appeals decision that in turn affirmed the circuit court's judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17543 - 2017-09-21
. Accordingly, we affirm the court of appeals decision that in turn affirmed the circuit court's judgment
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17543 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Wood County: THOMAS B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117904 - 2017-09-21
-RESPONDENTS-APPELLANTS. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Wood County: THOMAS B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117904 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
), reversing the Racine County circuit court's1 judgment of conviction against Jeffrey Hineman for first
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608990 - 2023-02-22
), reversing the Racine County circuit court's1 judgment of conviction against Jeffrey Hineman for first
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=608990 - 2023-02-22
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Jill Gilbert
. The evaluator’s recommendation for psychological testing to determine the client’s ability to make sound judgments
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17073 - 2005-03-31
. The evaluator’s recommendation for psychological testing to determine the client’s ability to make sound judgments
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17073 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable, representing its will rather than its judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40081 - 2014-09-15
was arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable, representing its will rather than its judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40081 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Edward A. Hammer
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Racine County, Gerald P
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17441 - 2017-09-21
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the Circuit Court of Racine County, Gerald P
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17441 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. River City Refuse Removal, Inc.
concluded on cross-motions for summary judgment that the “great similarities between the current case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21209 - 2017-09-21
concluded on cross-motions for summary judgment that the “great similarities between the current case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21209 - 2017-09-21
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael D. Mandelman
of a judgment being taken. The attorney advised Reitz he would take judgment, but would delay docketing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25169 - 2011-05-23
of a judgment being taken. The attorney advised Reitz he would take judgment, but would delay docketing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25169 - 2011-05-23