Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59921 - 59930 of 83478 for simple case search.
Search results 59921 - 59930 of 83478 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision, concurrent to Ehrich’s sentence in a Minnesota case. The circuit court followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255244 - 2020-02-25
of extended supervision, concurrent to Ehrich’s sentence in a Minnesota case. The circuit court followed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255244 - 2020-02-25
[PDF]
State v. Martin V. Yanick, Jr.
sentenced prior to its effective date is an issue currently pending in another case before this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6415 - 2017-09-19
sentenced prior to its effective date is an issue currently pending in another case before this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6415 - 2017-09-19
Wayne J. Houpt v. Roger C. Chase
disagree. This case is similar to Draeger v. Gutzdorf, 159 Wis. 2d 596, 465 N.W.2d 204 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5009 - 2005-03-31
disagree. This case is similar to Draeger v. Gutzdorf, 159 Wis. 2d 596, 465 N.W.2d 204 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5009 - 2005-03-31
Gary Reissner v. City of Prescott
to the “exceptional circumstances” of that case. Id. The facts of Meas are distinguishable from the present case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7406 - 2005-03-31
to the “exceptional circumstances” of that case. Id. The facts of Meas are distinguishable from the present case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7406 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92606 - 2014-09-15
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92606 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Thomas Willan v. Columbia County
raises several issues. We affirm. ¶2 This case arises from Willan’s request to Columbia County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2333 - 2017-09-19
raises several issues. We affirm. ¶2 This case arises from Willan’s request to Columbia County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2333 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238947 - 2019-04-17
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238947 - 2019-04-17
State v. Dean A Goehring, Sr.
equates the two in Goehring’s case, because he has not shown that his therapy included a mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11616 - 2005-03-31
equates the two in Goehring’s case, because he has not shown that his therapy included a mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11616 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher Phillip Ries
whether the three traditional sentencing factors have ever been meaningfully considered in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9620 - 2017-09-19
whether the three traditional sentencing factors have ever been meaningfully considered in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9620 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. The no-merit report does not discuss the mandatory DNA surcharges applied in this case. The potential issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174638 - 2017-09-21
. The no-merit report does not discuss the mandatory DNA surcharges applied in this case. The potential issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174638 - 2017-09-21