Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59931 - 59940 of 91923 for affidavit of service from.
Search results 59931 - 59940 of 91923 for affidavit of service from.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
appeals from orders of the circuit court denying his “Petition for Postconviction Relief” and his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1114717 - 2026-05-06
appeals from orders of the circuit court denying his “Petition for Postconviction Relief” and his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1114717 - 2026-05-06
[PDF]
Rule Order
questions. The court received a written response from the Judicial Council's Evidence & Civil Procedure
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137530 - 2017-09-21
questions. The court received a written response from the Judicial Council's Evidence & Civil Procedure
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137530 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert Wilson
/a Warren G. Gobert, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12920 - 2005-03-31
/a Warren G. Gobert, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12920 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
or notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction. We did so in our order of July 19, 2012. Therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106755 - 2014-01-09
or notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction. We did so in our order of July 19, 2012. Therefore
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106755 - 2014-01-09
State v. Corey W. Schulte
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Sauk County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3719 - 2005-03-31
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Sauk County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3719 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert M. Wheeler
, V. ROBERT M. WHEELER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3711 - 2017-09-19
, V. ROBERT M. WHEELER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3711 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
2023AP645-CR
) that reinstatement violated his right to be free from double jeopardy. ¶9 The court of appeals rejected each
/supreme/docs/23ap645mandate.pdf - 2025-07-01
) that reinstatement violated his right to be free from double jeopardy. ¶9 The court of appeals rejected each
/supreme/docs/23ap645mandate.pdf - 2025-07-01
[PDF]
WI 30
) that reinstatement violated his right to be free from double jeopardy. ¶9 The court of appeals rejected each
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977954 - 2025-07-01
) that reinstatement violated his right to be free from double jeopardy. ¶9 The court of appeals rejected each
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977954 - 2025-07-01
Frontsheet
of Appeals. Reversed. ¶1 PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, C.J. This sentence credit case arises from Andrew
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144056 - 2015-07-06
of Appeals. Reversed. ¶1 PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, C.J. This sentence credit case arises from Andrew
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144056 - 2015-07-06
[PDF]
NOTICE
-RESPONDENT, V. SCOTT PROUTY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54378 - 2014-09-15
-RESPONDENT, V. SCOTT PROUTY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54378 - 2014-09-15