Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 59991 - 60000 of 61723 for judgment.
Search results 59991 - 60000 of 61723 for judgment.
[PDF]
NOTICE
will and not its judgment; 1 For example, the examiner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31055 - 2014-09-15
will and not its judgment; 1 For example, the examiner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31055 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
not substitute its judgment for that of the agency as to the weight of the evidence on any disputed finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364107 - 2021-05-06
not substitute its judgment for that of the agency as to the weight of the evidence on any disputed finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=364107 - 2021-05-06
Calumet County Department of Human Services v. Randall H.
687, 692-693 (3d Cir. 1981). "[O]n appeal, we review the district court's judgment as a mixed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16507 - 2005-03-31
687, 692-693 (3d Cir. 1981). "[O]n appeal, we review the district court's judgment as a mixed
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16507 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth D. Paulson
for reasonableness in all the circumstances, applying a heavy measure of deference to counsel's judgments." Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12178 - 2005-03-31
for reasonableness in all the circumstances, applying a heavy measure of deference to counsel's judgments." Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12178 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
A. Ronald Wulf v. Township of Montello
, oppressive and unreasonable, representing its will and not its judgment; and (3) whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11107 - 2017-09-19
, oppressive and unreasonable, representing its will and not its judgment; and (3) whether the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11107 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Maria S.
the evidence is inherently or patently incredible will [the court] substitute [its] judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6813 - 2017-09-20
the evidence is inherently or patently incredible will [the court] substitute [its] judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6813 - 2017-09-20
2010 WI APP 36
). We do not substitute our judgment for the Commission’s in considering the weight or credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46203 - 2010-03-30
). We do not substitute our judgment for the Commission’s in considering the weight or credibility
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46203 - 2010-03-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to vacate his judgment of conviction, conclude he received ineffective assistance, or grant his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575407 - 2022-10-12
to vacate his judgment of conviction, conclude he received ineffective assistance, or grant his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=575407 - 2022-10-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
judgment and remanded for further fact finding as to the contents of the video recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58652 - 2014-09-15
judgment and remanded for further fact finding as to the contents of the video recording
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58652 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
the judgment and order following the direct appeal, we held: (1) “the trial court did not err in summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35646 - 2014-09-15
the judgment and order following the direct appeal, we held: (1) “the trial court did not err in summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35646 - 2014-09-15