Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 61 - 70 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 61 - 70 of 58340 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
to fully communicate with him; failing to preserve his speedy trial demand; and failing to follow through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32738 - 2008-05-19
to fully communicate with him; failing to preserve his speedy trial demand; and failing to follow through
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32738 - 2008-05-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
pandering, as a party to a crime. On February 28, 2011, Harris filed a speedy trial demand. Shortly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226511 - 2018-11-06
pandering, as a party to a crime. On February 28, 2011, Harris filed a speedy trial demand. Shortly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226511 - 2018-11-06
State v. Timothy D. Woods
no-contest plea waived a speedy trial claim. We conclude it did. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24815 - 2006-04-12
no-contest plea waived a speedy trial claim. We conclude it did. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24815 - 2006-04-12
State v. Johnny M. Lacy
. The issues are whether his constitutional and statutory rights to a speedy trial were violated, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3946 - 2005-03-31
. The issues are whether his constitutional and statutory rights to a speedy trial were violated, whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3946 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles L. Wilson
that his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated, and that the delay was caused by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21120 - 2006-01-30
that his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated, and that the delay was caused by the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21120 - 2006-01-30
[PDF]
State v. Charles L. Wilson
that his constitutional No. 2005AP0036-CR 2 right to a speedy trial was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21120 - 2017-09-21
that his constitutional No. 2005AP0036-CR 2 right to a speedy trial was violated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21120 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
with him; failing to preserve his speedy trial demand; and failing to follow through and file a Terry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32738 - 2014-09-15
with him; failing to preserve his speedy trial demand; and failing to follow through and file a Terry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32738 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Timothy D. Woods
a speedy trial claim. We conclude it did. We affirm. ¶2 Although Woods’ opening brief is somewhat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24815 - 2017-09-21
a speedy trial claim. We conclude it did. We affirm. ¶2 Although Woods’ opening brief is somewhat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24815 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. I reject this argument and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599089 - 2022-12-08
-CR 2 constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. I reject this argument and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=599089 - 2022-12-08
[PDF]
WI APP 78
that the State violated his speedy trial rights under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (“IAD”) as adopted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97268 - 2014-09-15
that the State violated his speedy trial rights under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (“IAD”) as adopted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97268 - 2014-09-15