Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 601 - 610 of 8736 for WA 0821 7001 0763 (FORTRESS) pintu baja 120 cm Cengkareng Kota Jakarta Barat Dki Jakarta.

State v. Dorian B. Stock
. Appeal Nos. 02-0159-CR 02-0160-CR Cir. Ct. Nos. 99-CM-346 99-CM-347 STATE OF WISCONSIN IN COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4844 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
of cocaine contrary to Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(cm)1r.[1] The circuit court imposed a fifty-four-month term
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94997 - 2013-04-01

[PDF] State v. Monte L. Jackson
a dangerous weapon, see §§ 161.16(2)(b)(1), 161.41(1m)(cm)(3), and 939.63, STATS., 1993-94, possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13187 - 2017-09-21

State v. James Ward
)(cm)3, and 161.48, Stats., 1993-94.[1] Ward also appeals from an order denying his postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12371 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
grams of cocaine, in violation of WIS. STAT. § 961.41(1)(cm)1r. (2007-08), possessing with intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47247 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Daniel F. Kratochwill
of cocaine, as a drug offense repeater, in violation of §§ 161.41(1m)(cm)3 and 161.48, STATS. He appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10390 - 2017-09-20

State v. Jesse Ruiz
offense, in violation of Wis. Stat. § 961.41(1m)(cm)3. (2001-02), in exchange for the State’s dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25413 - 2006-06-05

COURT OF APPEALS
. § 961.41(1)(cm)1r. (2007-08), possessing with intent to deliver more than forty grams of cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47247 - 2010-02-22

State v. Daniel F. Kratochwill
fifteen and forty grams of cocaine, as a drug offense repeater, in violation of §§ 161.41(1m)(cm)3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10390 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
. § 961.41(1m)(cm)3 (2007-08).[2] After her motion to suppress was denied, she pled no contest to possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59276 - 2011-01-25