Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 601 - 610 of 773 for leon.
Search results 601 - 610 of 773 for leon.
State v. Robert W. Sweat
there was a brief by Leon S. Schmidt, Jr. And Schmidt, Grace & Duncan, Wisconsin Rapids and oral argument by Leon S
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17038 - 2005-03-31
there was a brief by Leon S. Schmidt, Jr. And Schmidt, Grace & Duncan, Wisconsin Rapids and oral argument by Leon S
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17038 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Florence County: LEON D. STENZ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379752 - 2021-06-22
., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Florence County: LEON D. STENZ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=379752 - 2021-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
not consider the applicability of the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule under United States v. Leon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40933 - 2009-09-14
not consider the applicability of the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule under United States v. Leon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40933 - 2009-09-14
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
on the brief of Thomas L. Shriner, Jr., and Leon W. Todd III of Foley & Lardner LLP, Milwaukee. 2008 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33042 - 2008-07-29
on the brief of Thomas L. Shriner, Jr., and Leon W. Todd III of Foley & Lardner LLP, Milwaukee. 2008 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33042 - 2008-07-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for Florence County: LEON D. STENZ, Judge. Affirmed. Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353021 - 2021-04-06
for Florence County: LEON D. STENZ, Judge. Affirmed. Before Stark, P.J., Hruz and Seidl, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=353021 - 2021-04-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Florence County: LEON D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962208 - 2025-05-28
, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Florence County: LEON D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=962208 - 2025-05-28
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, 2010 WI 84, ¶33, 327 Wis. 2d 252, 786 N.W.2d 97 (quoting United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 918
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=383016 - 2021-07-01
, 2010 WI 84, ¶33, 327 Wis. 2d 252, 786 N.W.2d 97 (quoting United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 918
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=383016 - 2021-07-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
to the exclusionary rule under United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984), and State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, 245 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40933 - 2014-09-15
to the exclusionary rule under United States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897 (1984), and State v. Eason, 2001 WI 98, 245 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40933 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Albert Carini v. The Medical Protective Company
be inferred from the testimony of Drs. James Green and Leon Charash that Liethen’s negligence increased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12663 - 2017-09-21
be inferred from the testimony of Drs. James Green and Leon Charash that Liethen’s negligence increased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12663 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 918 (1984)). Relevant here, the good-faith exception applies when law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305953 - 2020-11-19
States v. Leon, 468 U.S. 897, 918 (1984)). Relevant here, the good-faith exception applies when law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305953 - 2020-11-19