Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 601 - 610 of 7561 for ye.
Search results 601 - 610 of 7561 for ye.
[PDF]
State v. Daniel J. Jurkovic
. At that point, Officer Walsh told Jurkovic that she needed a yes or no answer. Jurkovic did not respond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16299 - 2017-09-21
. At that point, Officer Walsh told Jurkovic that she needed a yes or no answer. Jurkovic did not respond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16299 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
testified: Q: Do you recall ever being told what you were charged with back in ’94? A: Yes, I do. Q: Okay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108889 - 2014-03-11
testified: Q: Do you recall ever being told what you were charged with back in ’94? A: Yes, I do. Q: Okay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108889 - 2014-03-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, a restraining order in place? [OFFICER MUSSATI:] I did, yes. [THE PROSECUTOR:] And did you also confirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446897 - 2021-11-02
, a restraining order in place? [OFFICER MUSSATI:] I did, yes. [THE PROSECUTOR:] And did you also confirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=446897 - 2021-11-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
]: Yes. [Kathleen’s attorney]: Where are you employed? [Kathleen]: I work at the Dane County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72888 - 2014-09-15
]: Yes. [Kathleen’s attorney]: Where are you employed? [Kathleen]: I work at the Dane County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72888 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Patricia H. Roth v. LaFarge School District Board of Canvassers
a recount on November 11. During the recount the board disqualified three “yes” votes as well as three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3514 - 2017-09-19
a recount on November 11. During the recount the board disqualified three “yes” votes as well as three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3514 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 63
. The circuit court changed the answer to this verdict question to “yes.” It then directed a verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47759 - 2014-09-15
. The circuit court changed the answer to this verdict question to “yes.” It then directed a verdict
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47759 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 63
and therefore violated § 100.18. The circuit court changed the answer to this verdict question to “yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47759 - 2010-05-25
and therefore violated § 100.18. The circuit court changed the answer to this verdict question to “yes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47759 - 2010-05-25
Barron County v. Deanna C.
. Have you had adequate time to go over the pending issues with [your attorney]? [CARLOS]: Yes, sir
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4407 - 2005-03-31
. Have you had adequate time to go over the pending issues with [your attorney]? [CARLOS]: Yes, sir
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4407 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Barron County v. Deanna C.
time to go over the pending issues with [your attorney]? [CARLOS]: Yes, sir. THE COURT: Do you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4407 - 2017-09-19
time to go over the pending issues with [your attorney]? [CARLOS]: Yes, sir. THE COURT: Do you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4407 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Hans Gerger
. THE COURT: Is that the understanding? [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Yes, it is your honor. THE COURT: And we’re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13995 - 2014-09-15
. THE COURT: Is that the understanding? [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Yes, it is your honor. THE COURT: And we’re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13995 - 2014-09-15