Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6001 - 6010 of 68877 for he.
Search results 6001 - 6010 of 68877 for he.
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jevon Jones Jaconi
but instead he and the OLR filed a SCR 22.12 stipulation in which Jaconi admitted the facts and misconduct
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16801 - 2005-03-31
but instead he and the OLR filed a SCR 22.12 stipulation in which Jaconi admitted the facts and misconduct
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16801 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration. Spencer contends that he is entitled to sentence modification based on a new factor: evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253587 - 2020-02-06
for reconsideration. Spencer contends that he is entitled to sentence modification based on a new factor: evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253587 - 2020-02-06
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Jevon Jones Jaconi
alleging 20 separate counts of misconduct against Jaconi. Jaconi did not file an answer but instead he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16801 - 2017-09-21
alleging 20 separate counts of misconduct against Jaconi. Jaconi did not file an answer but instead he
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16801 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that he should be permitted to withdraw his no-contest plea for two reasons: (1) his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800711 - 2024-05-14
contends that he should be permitted to withdraw his no-contest plea for two reasons: (1) his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800711 - 2024-05-14
[PDF]
NOTICE
conclude that Vasquez was notified that where he spent his free time was a factor in determining his bona
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50842 - 2014-09-15
conclude that Vasquez was notified that where he spent his free time was a factor in determining his bona
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50842 - 2014-09-15
State v. Bradley W. Sexton
verdict of five counts of criminal non-support, one count for each year he failed to make payments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2805 - 2005-03-31
verdict of five counts of criminal non-support, one count for each year he failed to make payments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2805 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
safety?” Juror 19 replied, “Well … say he got convicted, does he hold a grudge against the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238090 - 2019-03-26
safety?” Juror 19 replied, “Well … say he got convicted, does he hold a grudge against the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238090 - 2019-03-26
Jonathan Snapp v. Jessie Jean-Claude, M.D.
was in a motorcycle accident in which he sustained severe leg injuries. Snapp was first taken to Aurora Lakeland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20970 - 2006-01-17
was in a motorcycle accident in which he sustained severe leg injuries. Snapp was first taken to Aurora Lakeland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20970 - 2006-01-17
[PDF]
State v. Ernest E. Halford
Halford contends that he is entitled to a new trial because (1) he was deprived of his right to a fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2394 - 2017-09-19
Halford contends that he is entitled to a new trial because (1) he was deprived of his right to a fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2394 - 2017-09-19
State v. Peter C. Ramuta
of fleeing an officer, see Wis. Stat. § 346.04(3). He also appeals the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5296 - 2005-03-31
of fleeing an officer, see Wis. Stat. § 346.04(3). He also appeals the trial court’s order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5296 - 2005-03-31