Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6001 - 6010 of 12458 for mr.

[PDF] State v. Vincent E. Smith
se: We then came back on the 11 th , and you inquired at that time whether or not Mr. Smith
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2571 - 2017-09-19

State v. Steven G. Walters
against what I found or compared in Mr. Walters.” She also testified that she had assessed Walters’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4192 - 2005-03-31

City of Watertown v. Jeffrey M. Wagner
. at 461. Wagner asserts that the “trial court found that Mr. Wagner, like Mr. Renard, asked for a breath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5354 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Donald Geller v. Gerald Niedert
and bore the typed names of "Mr. and Mrs. Donald Geller." While it was signed only by Donald, Lee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9991 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the community. There hasn’t been any violence emanating from Mr. Echols, there hasn’t been any predatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73090 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
reason to stop Mr. Braly’s vehicle as a result of the officer’s perception that the vehicle had entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=530392 - 2022-06-09

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 08, 2005 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
on the information presented by [the agent] that Mr. White knew of the new rules of supervision. This information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20172 - 2007-01-24

State v. Harold W. Zastrow
are here on any criminal case to listen closely as I go over the constitutional rights with Mr. Bradford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15628 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the presentence investigation report, which said: “Mr. Jones impresses me as an extremely dangerous individual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54852 - 2010-09-27

State v. Lana Lanser
: Sustained. MR. KAISER: I don’t understand the objection. THE COURT: Objection is sustained. It’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15498 - 2005-03-31