Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6001 - 6010 of 19271 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 6001 - 6010 of 19271 for transfer by affidavit.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
[the caller’s] name.” ¶4 According to affidavits of the process server and another agency employee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93971 - 2014-09-15
[the caller’s] name.” ¶4 According to affidavits of the process server and another agency employee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93971 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
device placed on his vehicle. Schlifer claims that the law enforcement affidavit used to obtain
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348653 - 2021-03-25
device placed on his vehicle. Schlifer claims that the law enforcement affidavit used to obtain
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=348653 - 2021-03-25
[PDF]
Robert J. Ollman v. Scott H. Pecor
in August 2002. In October 2002, Pecor recorded with the Register of Deeds an “affidavit” indicating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25098 - 2017-09-21
in August 2002. In October 2002, Pecor recorded with the Register of Deeds an “affidavit” indicating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25098 - 2017-09-21
Kenneth J. Yorgan v. Thomas W. Durkin
and attachments but no evidentiary affidavits to support his motion and Yorgan countered with a brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7528 - 2005-03-31
and attachments but no evidentiary affidavits to support his motion and Yorgan countered with a brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7528 - 2005-03-31
Justin Pichler v. United States Fire Insurance Company
, Ben Blythers. It all started when, according to Justin’s affidavit submitted to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14002 - 2005-03-31
, Ben Blythers. It all started when, according to Justin’s affidavit submitted to the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14002 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.” The server “never did get [the caller’s] name.” ¶4 According to affidavits of the process server
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93971 - 2013-03-12
.” The server “never did get [the caller’s] name.” ¶4 According to affidavits of the process server
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93971 - 2013-03-12
Uni-General Corporation v. Century 21 Great American Homes, Inc.
strategic reasons. It claims that Uni-General "admitted" in its affidavit that “it could have brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14049 - 2005-03-31
strategic reasons. It claims that Uni-General "admitted" in its affidavit that “it could have brought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14049 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
provisions of WIS. STAT. § 893.80. The Town Clerk filed an affidavit stating she had not been served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162724 - 2017-09-21
provisions of WIS. STAT. § 893.80. The Town Clerk filed an affidavit stating she had not been served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162724 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Kenneth J. Yorgan v. Thomas W. Durkin
. He filed a brief and attachments but no evidentiary affidavits to support his motion and Yorgan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7528 - 2017-09-19
. He filed a brief and attachments but no evidentiary affidavits to support his motion and Yorgan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7528 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in concluding that the affidavit in support of the search warrant established probable cause that a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865051 - 2024-10-23
in concluding that the affidavit in support of the search warrant established probable cause that a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865051 - 2024-10-23