Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 60011 - 60020 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 60011 - 60020 of 83389 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
placed in an unrelated case on April 5, 2013, and one condition required Kelly to have absolutely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139180 - 2017-09-21
placed in an unrelated case on April 5, 2013, and one condition required Kelly to have absolutely
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139180 - 2017-09-21
State v. James L. Kirk
to a crime. It is thus inapplicable to this case. Kirk also contends that he could not be guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6644 - 2005-03-31
to a crime. It is thus inapplicable to this case. Kirk also contends that he could not be guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6644 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that his probation in this case had been previously revoked. When Murphy began debating the point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60273 - 2011-02-22
that his probation in this case had been previously revoked. When Murphy began debating the point
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60273 - 2011-02-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
cases. The court sentenced Smith to a total of three years of initial confinement and three years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188017 - 2017-09-21
cases. The court sentenced Smith to a total of three years of initial confinement and three years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188017 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605276 - 2022-12-28
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2019-20).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605276 - 2022-12-28
[PDF]
James Hanlon v. Town Board of Milton
.2d 326, 327 (1992). Applying the standards to this case, we conclude that the independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10252 - 2017-09-20
.2d 326, 327 (1992). Applying the standards to this case, we conclude that the independent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10252 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Gary Reissner v. City of Prescott
was therefore limited to the “exceptional circumstances” of that case. Id. The facts of Meas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7406 - 2017-09-20
was therefore limited to the “exceptional circumstances” of that case. Id. The facts of Meas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7406 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the procedural history of the case and addresses Yang’s pleas, his sentences, and the postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261840 - 2020-05-27
the procedural history of the case and addresses Yang’s pleas, his sentences, and the postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261840 - 2020-05-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
counts, plus additional charges in three other cases, were dismissed and read in for sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456960 - 2021-11-24
counts, plus additional charges in three other cases, were dismissed and read in for sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=456960 - 2021-11-24
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Andrew L. Hunsick
2001 WI 58 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 01-1212-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16505 - 2017-09-21
2001 WI 58 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 01-1212-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16505 - 2017-09-21