Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 6021 - 6030 of 83344 for case search.
Search results 6021 - 6030 of 83344 for case search.
State v. Brian L. Edwards
" search of Edwards at the scene but did not find any weapons or contraband. The officer did not handcuff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8153 - 2005-03-31
" search of Edwards at the scene but did not find any weapons or contraband. The officer did not handcuff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8153 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jennifer R. Gonzalez
to a search warrant should have been suppressed because the affidavit in support of No(s). 97-2422-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12916 - 2017-09-21
to a search warrant should have been suppressed because the affidavit in support of No(s). 97-2422-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12916 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John A. Mosley, Sr.
to which Mosley pled guilty. The officer did not have a search warrant, and Mosley did not consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12089 - 2017-09-21
to which Mosley pled guilty. The officer did not have a search warrant, and Mosley did not consent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12089 - 2017-09-21
State v. John A. Mosley, Sr.
, and underlies the charge to which Mosley pled guilty. The officer did not have a search warrant, and Mosley did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12089 - 2005-03-31
, and underlies the charge to which Mosley pled guilty. The officer did not have a search warrant, and Mosley did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12089 - 2005-03-31
City of Horicon v. Karl K. Albert
did not violate Albert’s constitutional rights because it did not constitute a “search” or “seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15273 - 2005-03-31
did not violate Albert’s constitutional rights because it did not constitute a “search” or “seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15273 - 2005-03-31
City of Horicon v. Karl K. Albert
did not violate Albert’s constitutional rights because it did not constitute a “search” or “seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15274 - 2005-03-31
did not violate Albert’s constitutional rights because it did not constitute a “search” or “seizure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15274 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
information, while Dustin went to drive around the mall parking lot to search for the stolen vehicle. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40041 - 2009-09-01
information, while Dustin went to drive around the mall parking lot to search for the stolen vehicle. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40041 - 2009-09-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
Dustin went to drive around the mall parking lot to search for the stolen vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40041 - 2014-09-15
Dustin went to drive around the mall parking lot to search for the stolen vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40041 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
violated ordinance § 7.01(8), and under “Description of Violation” it stated, “[F]ailure to allow search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59760 - 2014-09-15
violated ordinance § 7.01(8), and under “Description of Violation” it stated, “[F]ailure to allow search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59760 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 68
2009 WI APP 68 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP1641-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36095 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 68 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2008AP1641-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36095 - 2014-09-15